Discussion:
Lupin Lodge Continues to Support BDSM groups. Plans another "Fox Hunt"
(too old to reply)
Anna
2011-05-30 16:11:52 UTC
Permalink
It seems like even Nudiarist is afraid of Lupin Lodge. Certainly AANR
is. Lupin Lodge continues to support at least two (that we know of)
BDSM groups using their property for their activity. The so called
human "Fox Hunt" where people dress up as animals was so successful
that they will be having another one September 16-18th, 2011.

http://foxhunt.lycanthrope.net/

The same group uses Lupin Lodge for a monthy "furry party" on the
first Friday of every month,

http://www.mastscc.blogspot.com/

Now there's another group that also uses Lupin Lodge that calls itself
Masters and slaves (always lower case when referring to slaves)
Together Santa Clara County (MAsTSCC).

They meet on the first Sunday of each month. And they bring "toys".

"Uncle Abdul" is the leader of that group. Would you want your kids
to run naked around "Uncle Abdul"?

And you wonder why so many in the general public think that nudists
are a bunch of sexual sickos.
Anna
2011-05-30 16:26:08 UTC
Permalink
It seems like even Nudiarist is afraid of Lupin Lodge.  Certainly AANR
is.  Lupin Lodge continues to support at least two (that we know of)
BDSM groups using their property for their activity.  The so called
human "Fox Hunt" where people dress up as animals was so successful
that they will be having another one September 16-18th, 2011.
http://foxhunt.lycanthrope.net/
The same group uses Lupin Lodge for a monthy "furry party" on the
first Friday of every month,
http://www.mastscc.blogspot.com/
Now there's another group that also uses Lupin Lodge that calls itself
Masters and slaves (always lower case when referring to slaves)
Together Santa Clara County (MAsTSCC).
They meet on the first Sunday of each month.  And they bring "toys".
"Uncle Abdul" is the leader of that group.  Would you want your kids
to run naked around "Uncle Abdul"?
And you wonder why so many in the general public think that nudists
are a bunch of sexual sickos.
By the way, I have asked Nudiarist several times why he has stopped
talking about this issue on his blog and he has yet to respond. I
don't really know what's up with that. Nor do I know what actions
AANR has done regarding this but whatever the actions they seem not
to be working that is if they have even done anything.
Virtual Shadow
2011-05-30 17:28:03 UTC
Permalink
It seems like even Nudiarist is afraid of Lupin Lodge. Certainly AANR
is. Lupin Lodge continues to support at least two (that we know of)
BDSM groups using their property for their activity. The so called
human "Fox Hunt" where people dress up as animals was so successful
that they will be having another one September 16-18th, 2011.
Chupa mi verga.
Yankie Boss
2011-05-31 22:30:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Anna
It seems like even Nudiarist is afraid of Lupin Lodge.  Certainly AANR
is.  Lupin Lodge continues to support at least two (that we know of)
BDSM groups using their property for their activity.  The so called
human "Fox Hunt" where people dress up as animals was so successful
that they will be having another one September 16-18th, 2011.
http://foxhunt.lycanthrope.net/
The same group uses Lupin Lodge for a monthy "furry party" on the
first Friday of every month,
http://www.mastscc.blogspot.com/
Now there's another group that also uses Lupin Lodge that calls itself
Masters and slaves (always lower case when referring to slaves)
Together Santa Clara County (MAsTSCC).
They meet on the first Sunday of each month.  And they bring "toys".
"Uncle Abdul" is the leader of that group.  Would you want your kids
to run naked around "Uncle Abdul"?
And you wonder why so many in the general public think that nudists
are a bunch of sexual sickos.
By the way, I have asked Nudiarist several times why he has stopped
talking about this issue on his blog and he has yet to respond.  I
don't really know what's up with that.  Nor do I know what actions
AANR has done regarding this but whatever the  actions they seem not
to be working that is if they have even done anything.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
You sound surprised that you have received no response.
I think the silence says it all
Jenny6833A
2011-05-30 18:48:41 UTC
Permalink
On May 30, 9:11 am, Anna <***@lycos.com> wrote:

<snip>
Post by Anna
Lupin Lodge continues to support at least two (that we know of)
BDSM groups using their property for their activity.
Do they "support" BDSM groups, or merely rent to them?

If the former, so what?

If the latter, so what?

When I was a kid, my mother took me to a large, publicly owned stadium
to see various shows. One of them had some rather rauchy lead-in
performances followed by some Elvis-like dork doing a REALLY rauchy
act while singing badly. A few weeks later, I was treated to a quite
similar sequence of lead-in acts culminating with Billy Graham doing
his equally bizarre come-to-Jesus performance.

Mom most definitely was NOT a fan of either headliner, but thought I
ought to be aware of such stuff and preferred that my initial exposure
be with her. In both cases, she analyzed what we saw as it was
happening via a sotto-voce running commentary.

A year or so later, she got us Row Two seats at a boxing match in
which some highly ranked guy from Hoboken beat the local hero damn
near to death -- therebye getting us both sprayed with blood and gore
and giving me a very close-up view of the damage done. THUD. SQUIRT.

Which brings me to some questions for Mr Anna:

1. Was the stadium commission that rented to the rauncy Elvis-like
show "supporting" the goings-on?

2. Was the stadium commission that rented to the bizarre Billy Graham
show "supporting" those goings-on?

3. Was my Mom "supporting" either of them? Was she "supporting"
boxing and the "let them fight until one falls down" mentality of the
day?

4. Or was I, in each case, getting a parentally supervised education?
Post by Anna
And you wonder why so many in the general public think that nudists
are a bunch of sexual sickos.
If we'd lived in the San Jose area, my Mom would have taken me to
Lupin too, on regular days and on rent-the-premises days. She'd have
reasoned that I needed to know about such stuff. She didn't believe
in sticking her own head in the sand -- or mine either.

She was not a fan of keeping kids ignorant. Nor am I.

:-)

Jenny
(who suspects that Mr Anna will ignore this post. Either that or
produce 30 posts, 29 of which are in answer to himself, and none of
which answer my questions.)
Zee
2011-05-30 20:56:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jenny6833A
<snip>
Post by Anna
Lupin Lodge continues to support at least two (that we know of)
BDSM groups using their property for their activity.
Do they "support" BDSM groups, or merely rent to them?
If the former, so what?
If the latter, so what?
When I was a kid, my mother took me to a large, publicly owned stadium
to see various shows.  One of them had some rather rauchy lead-in
performances followed by some Elvis-like dork doing a REALLY rauchy
act while singing badly.  A few weeks later, I was treated to a quite
similar sequence of lead-in acts culminating with Billy Graham doing
his equally bizarre come-to-Jesus performance.
Mom most definitely was NOT a fan of either headliner, but thought I
ought to be aware of such stuff and preferred that my initial exposure
be with her.  In both cases, she analyzed what we saw as it was
happening via a sotto-voce running commentary.
A year or so later, she got us Row Two seats at a boxing match in
which some highly ranked guy from Hoboken beat the local hero damn
near to death -- therebye getting us both sprayed with blood and gore
and giving me a very close-up view of the damage done.  THUD.  SQUIRT.
1.  Was the stadium commission that rented to the rauncy Elvis-like
show "supporting" the goings-on?
2.  Was the stadium commission that rented to the bizarre Billy Graham
show "supporting" those goings-on?
3.  Was my Mom "supporting" either of them?  Was she "supporting"
boxing and the "let them fight until one falls down" mentality of the
day?
4.  Or was I, in each case, getting a parentally supervised education?
Post by Anna
And you wonder why so many in the general public think that nudists
are a bunch of sexual sickos.
If we'd lived in the San Jose area, my Mom would have taken me to
Lupin too, on regular days and on rent-the-premises days.  She'd have
reasoned that I needed to know about such stuff.  She didn't believe
in sticking her own head in the sand -- or mine either.
She was not a fan of keeping kids ignorant.  Nor am I.
:-)
Jenny
(who suspects that Mr Anna will ignore this post.  Either that or
produce 30 posts, 29 of which are in answer to himself, and none of
which answer my questions.)
naw naw jenny....as you are just a progressive liberal with a bad evil
parent that taught you to harrass folks by calling them males rather
than female on the internet.....and just like the evil liberals offer
questions that are obviously stupid ...of which the answer to all your
questions is YES YES YES AND YES AND only a hate freak human would not
see clear what you are all about.....all good citizens are responsible
for their actions in business love social and all other ways....so
dumbs folks like you can rent to whomever that is seeking to rent no
questions ask and no one should ever complain....as i was just renting
not participating......what a joke idiot...and Anna it is nice to have
you back ...as it appears jenny has created ...virtual shadow as a
sock puppet ....so same ol same ol in rec nude...immature idiots
exposing themselves........regards......z
Anna
2011-05-31 18:35:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by Zee
Post by Jenny6833A
<snip>
Post by Anna
Lupin Lodge continues to support at least two (that we know of)
BDSM groups using their property for their activity.
Do they "support" BDSM groups, or merely rent to them?
If the former, so what?
If the latter, so what?
When I was a kid, my mother took me to a large, publicly owned stadium
to see various shows.  One of them had some rather rauchy lead-in
performances followed by some Elvis-like dork doing a REALLY rauchy
act while singing badly.  A few weeks later, I was treated to a quite
similar sequence of lead-in acts culminating with Billy Graham doing
his equally bizarre come-to-Jesus performance.
Mom most definitely was NOT a fan of either headliner, but thought I
ought to be aware of such stuff and preferred that my initial exposure
be with her.  In both cases, she analyzed what we saw as it was
happening via a sotto-voce running commentary.
A year or so later, she got us Row Two seats at a boxing match in
which some highly ranked guy from Hoboken beat the local hero damn
near to death -- therebye getting us both sprayed with blood and gore
and giving me a very close-up view of the damage done.  THUD.  SQUIRT.
1.  Was the stadium commission that rented to the rauncy Elvis-like
show "supporting" the goings-on?
2.  Was the stadium commission that rented to the bizarre Billy Graham
show "supporting" those goings-on?
3.  Was my Mom "supporting" either of them?  Was she "supporting"
boxing and the "let them fight until one falls down" mentality of the
day?
4.  Or was I, in each case, getting a parentally supervised education?
Post by Anna
And you wonder why so many in the general public think that nudists
are a bunch of sexual sickos.
If we'd lived in the San Jose area, my Mom would have taken me to
Lupin too, on regular days and on rent-the-premises days.  She'd have
reasoned that I needed to know about such stuff.  She didn't believe
in sticking her own head in the sand -- or mine either.
She was not a fan of keeping kids ignorant.  Nor am I.
:-)
Jenny
(who suspects that Mr Anna will ignore this post.  Either that or
produce 30 posts, 29 of which are in answer to himself, and none of
which answer my questions.)
naw naw jenny....as you are just a progressive liberal with a bad evil
parent that taught you to harrass folks by calling them males rather
than female on the internet.....and just like the evil liberals offer
questions that are obviously stupid ...of which the answer to all your
questions is YES YES YES AND YES AND only a hate freak human would not
see clear what you are all about.....all good citizens are responsible
for their actions in business love social and all other ways....so
dumbs folks like you can rent to whomever that is seeking  to rent no
questions ask and no one should ever complain....as i was just renting
not participating......what a joke idiot...and Anna it is nice to have
you back ...as it appears jenny has created ...virtual shadow as a
sock puppet ....so same ol same ol in rec nude...immature idiots
exposing themselves........regards......z
I was thinking about that poor little boy (real age around three or
so) they had a picture of dressed up in BDSM leather style clothing.
The mother took him to the Folsom Street Fair (this was several years
back now). I am sorry part of me does understand what Jenny was
saying but she is pushing the concept too far. Philosophically one
can talk about exposing children to "life's realities" but I really
would not want to go around like visiting farms when they kill the
cattle with my children and tell them "see this is how they get into
your happy meals". Now I know in other parts of the world children
are totally exposed to like everything, but people are pretty fucked
up in other parts of the world and that's one of the reasons they do
stuff like fly our planes into our buildings.
Anna
2011-05-31 19:16:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Anna
Post by Zee
Post by Jenny6833A
<snip>
Post by Anna
Lupin Lodge continues to support at least two (that we know of)
BDSM groups using their property for their activity.
Do they "support" BDSM groups, or merely rent to them?
If the former, so what?
If the latter, so what?
When I was a kid, my mother took me to a large, publicly owned stadium
to see various shows.  One of them had some rather rauchy lead-in
performances followed by some Elvis-like dork doing a REALLY rauchy
act while singing badly.  A few weeks later, I was treated to a quite
similar sequence of lead-in acts culminating with Billy Graham doing
his equally bizarre come-to-Jesus performance.
Mom most definitely was NOT a fan of either headliner, but thought I
ought to be aware of such stuff and preferred that my initial exposure
be with her.  In both cases, she analyzed what we saw as it was
happening via a sotto-voce running commentary.
A year or so later, she got us Row Two seats at a boxing match in
which some highly ranked guy from Hoboken beat the local hero damn
near to death -- therebye getting us both sprayed with blood and gore
and giving me a very close-up view of the damage done.  THUD.  SQUIRT.
1.  Was the stadium commission that rented to the rauncy Elvis-like
show "supporting" the goings-on?
2.  Was the stadium commission that rented to the bizarre Billy Graham
show "supporting" those goings-on?
3.  Was my Mom "supporting" either of them?  Was she "supporting"
boxing and the "let them fight until one falls down" mentality of the
day?
4.  Or was I, in each case, getting a parentally supervised education?
Post by Anna
And you wonder why so many in the general public think that nudists
are a bunch of sexual sickos.
If we'd lived in the San Jose area, my Mom would have taken me to
Lupin too, on regular days and on rent-the-premises days.  She'd have
reasoned that I needed to know about such stuff.  She didn't believe
in sticking her own head in the sand -- or mine either.
She was not a fan of keeping kids ignorant.  Nor am I.
:-)
Jenny
(who suspects that Mr Anna will ignore this post.  Either that or
produce 30 posts, 29 of which are in answer to himself, and none of
which answer my questions.)
naw naw jenny....as you are just a progressive liberal with a bad evil
parent that taught you to harrass folks by calling them males rather
than female on the internet.....and just like the evil liberals offer
questions that are obviously stupid ...of which the answer to all your
questions is YES YES YES AND YES AND only a hate freak human would not
see clear what you are all about.....all good citizens are responsible
for their actions in business love social and all other ways....so
dumbs folks like you can rent to whomever that is seeking  to rent no
questions ask and no one should ever complain....as i was just renting
not participating......what a joke idiot...and Anna it is nice to have
you back ...as it appears jenny has created ...virtual shadow as a
sock puppet ....so same ol same ol in rec nude...immature idiots
exposing themselves........regards......z
I was thinking about that poor little boy (real age around three or
so) they had a picture of dressed up in BDSM leather style clothing.
The mother took him to the Folsom Street Fair (this was several years
back now).  I am sorry part of me does understand what Jenny was
saying but she is pushing the concept too far.  Philosophically one
can talk about exposing children to "life's realities" but I really
would not want to go around like visiting farms when they kill the
cattle with my children and tell them "see this is how they get into
your happy meals".  Now I know in other parts of the world children
are totally exposed to like everything, but people are pretty fucked
up in other parts of the world and that's one of the reasons they do
stuff like fly our planes into our buildings.
Actually I guess the photo was of a two year old girl

http://xpress.sfsu.edu/archives/news/004352.html
Virtual Shadow
2011-05-30 23:47:46 UTC
Permalink
"Jenny6833A" <***@aol.com> wrote in message news:90446cef-3d79-4145-b711-***@s41g2000prb.googlegroups.com...
On May 30, 9:11 am, Anna <***@lycos.com> wrote:

<snip>
Post by Anna
Lupin Lodge continues to support at least two (that we know of)
BDSM groups using their property for their activity.
Do they "support" BDSM groups, or merely rent to them?

If the former, so what?

If the latter, so what?

When I was a kid, my mother took me to a large, publicly owned stadium
to see various shows. One of them had some rather rauchy lead-in
performances followed by some Elvis-like dork doing a REALLY rauchy
act while singing badly. A few weeks later, I was treated to a quite
similar sequence of lead-in acts culminating with Billy Graham doing
his equally bizarre come-to-Jesus performance.

Pray to Jesus or go to hell.
Anna
2011-05-31 18:26:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jenny6833A
<snip>
Post by Anna
Lupin Lodge continues to support at least two (that we know of)
BDSM groups using their property for their activity.
Do they "support" BDSM groups, or merely rent to them?
If the former, so what?
If the latter, so what?
When I was a kid, my mother took me to a large, publicly owned stadium
to see various shows.  One of them had some rather rauchy lead-in
performances followed by some Elvis-like dork doing a REALLY rauchy
act while singing badly.  A few weeks later, I was treated to a quite
similar sequence of lead-in acts culminating with Billy Graham doing
his equally bizarre come-to-Jesus performance.
Mom most definitely was NOT a fan of either headliner, but thought I
ought to be aware of such stuff and preferred that my initial exposure
be with her.  In both cases, she analyzed what we saw as it was
happening via a sotto-voce running commentary.
A year or so later, she got us Row Two seats at a boxing match in
which some highly ranked guy from Hoboken beat the local hero damn
near to death -- therebye getting us both sprayed with blood and gore
and giving me a very close-up view of the damage done.  THUD.  SQUIRT.
1.  Was the stadium commission that rented to the rauncy Elvis-like
show "supporting" the goings-on?
Yes, yes they were.They were saying that they saw such as being within
the scope of acceptability
Post by Jenny6833A
2.  Was the stadium commission that rented to the bizarre Billy Graham
show "supporting" those goings-on?
Yes, yes they were
Post by Jenny6833A
3.  Was my Mom "supporting" either of them?  Was she "supporting"
boxing and the "let them fight until one falls down" mentality of the
day?
Did she pay for a ticket for that Elvis thing? Did she walk out in
disgust after seeing it?
Post by Jenny6833A
4.  Or was I, in each case, getting a parentally supervised education?
Did she do this often? Did she go to places with you that she
"disapproved of" under the theory "well at least I am with them".

Did she take you to skid row and have you watch all the junkies stick
needles in their arms and watch the hoes do their tricks? Did she
have a friend at the police department who allowed you to sit in on
autopsies?

Did she have you come in and watch her have sex? After all, it's out
there. If you didn't see her do it you might see someone else.

Look, I somewhat understand the theory but like with everything else
it is a matter of degree and of course the whole thing about lines
which are different for each other but at the end is something we all
have. Sure there are stuff out there like wrestling matches or boxing
where you might not exactly approve of it but you know its out there
so you want to be the one to take them but even there would she have
taken you to a "battle to the death" boxing match. Sure they don't
exist (well in most the civilized world of course) but if they did. So
even there there are lines. But I have had the experience of going to
R rated movies and disapproving of seeing children there (children can
go to R rated movies if they have their parents there with them). The
worse case was when I went to Beowolf. What? They didn't want to
hire a baby sitter? Talk about trashy dysfunctional parents.

Look, what we are talking about here though is truth in advertising.
That is all I am asking for from Lupin Lodge, AANR and the Naturist
Society. Just be clear about what nudism is all about.

If it is about pushing sexuality to the edge, okay, then that is what
it is about. Be honest about it. Post these events on their web
site. Then when people go to the location they know what they are
getting into. Nudism tries to promote this whole "harmony with nature"
thing and by the way, that is what I am attracted to nudity for. For
many if not most nudism is simply about the feeling of not wearing any
clothes and it is indeed as you all say if sexualized at all it is
just on the most subtle of levels. But unfortunately while nude isn't
nude in and of itself it does seem to attract the lewd and at any
given time you have about at least 10-15 percent of the clubs
contaminated by the lewd.

The example you gave about the stadium well at least the two events
were separated by date and time. We have "Uncle Abdul" prowling
around Lupin every first weekend.

By the way did your mom ever take you to a strip club? I hope the
answer is no. I don't agree with exposing a kid to everything in the
world just because it exists. It exists but that doesn't mean one
will ever in their lives be exposed to it. Especially in America. I
guess you could go around exposing your child to cock fights and all
kinds of stuff "because it exists" but indeed it can screw a kid up
big time.
Post by Jenny6833A
Post by Anna
And you wonder why so many in the general public think that nudists
are a bunch of sexual sickos.
If we'd lived in the San Jose area, my Mom would have taken me to
Lupin too, on regular days and on rent-the-premises days.  She'd have
reasoned that I needed to know about such stuff.  She didn't believe
in sticking her own head in the sand -- or mine either.
She was not a fan of keeping kids ignorant.  Nor am I.
:-)
Jenny
(who suspects that Mr Anna will ignore this post.  Either that or
produce 30 posts, 29 of which are in answer to himself, and none of
which answer my questions.)
Anna
2011-05-31 19:23:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Anna
Post by Jenny6833A
<snip>
Post by Anna
Lupin Lodge continues to support at least two (that we know of)
BDSM groups using their property for their activity.
Do they "support" BDSM groups, or merely rent to them?
If the former, so what?
If the latter, so what?
When I was a kid, my mother took me to a large, publicly owned stadium
to see various shows.  One of them had some rather rauchy lead-in
performances followed by some Elvis-like dork doing a REALLY rauchy
act while singing badly.  A few weeks later, I was treated to a quite
similar sequence of lead-in acts culminating with Billy Graham doing
his equally bizarre come-to-Jesus performance.
Mom most definitely was NOT a fan of either headliner, but thought I
ought to be aware of such stuff and preferred that my initial exposure
be with her.  In both cases, she analyzed what we saw as it was
happening via a sotto-voce running commentary.
A year or so later, she got us Row Two seats at a boxing match in
which some highly ranked guy from Hoboken beat the local hero damn
near to death -- therebye getting us both sprayed with blood and gore
and giving me a very close-up view of the damage done.  THUD.  SQUIRT.
1.  Was the stadium commission that rented to the rauncy Elvis-like
show "supporting" the goings-on?
Yes, yes they were.They were saying that they saw such as being within
the scope of acceptability
Post by Jenny6833A
2.  Was the stadium commission that rented to the bizarre Billy Graham
show "supporting" those goings-on?
Yes, yes they were
Post by Jenny6833A
3.  Was my Mom "supporting" either of them?  Was she "supporting"
boxing and the "let them fight until one falls down" mentality of the
day?
Did she pay for a ticket for that Elvis thing?  Did she walk out in
disgust after seeing it?
Post by Jenny6833A
4.  Or was I, in each case, getting a parentally supervised education?
Did she do this often?  Did she go to places with you that she
"disapproved of" under the theory "well at least I am with them".
Did she take you to skid row and have you watch all the junkies stick
needles in their arms and watch the hoes do their tricks?  Did she
have a friend at the police department who allowed you to sit in on
autopsies?
Did she have you come in and watch her have sex?  After all, it's out
there. If you didn't see her do it you might see someone else.
Look, I somewhat understand the theory but like with everything else
it is a matter of degree and of course the whole thing about lines
which are different for each other but at the end is something we all
have.  Sure there are stuff out there like wrestling matches or boxing
where you might not exactly approve of it but you know its out there
so you want to be the one to take them but even there would she have
taken you to a "battle to the death" boxing match. Sure they don't
exist (well in most the civilized world of course) but if they did. So
even there there are lines.  But I have had the experience of going to
R rated movies and disapproving of seeing children there (children can
go to R rated movies if they have their parents there with them).  The
worse case was when I went to Beowolf.  What?  They didn't want to
hire a baby sitter?  Talk about trashy dysfunctional parents.
Look, what we are talking about here though is truth in advertising.
That is all I am asking for from Lupin Lodge, AANR and the Naturist
Society.  Just be clear about what nudism is all about.
If it is about pushing sexuality to the edge, okay, then that is what
it is about.  Be honest about it. Post these events on their web
site.  Then when people go to the location they know what they are
getting into. Nudism tries to promote this whole "harmony with nature"
thing and by the way, that is what I am attracted to nudity for.  For
many if not most nudism is simply about the feeling of not wearing any
clothes and it is indeed as you all say if sexualized at all it is
just on the most subtle of levels. But unfortunately while nude isn't
nude in and of itself it does seem to attract the lewd and at any
given time you have about at least 10-15 percent of the clubs
contaminated by the lewd.
The example you gave about the stadium well at least the two events
were separated by date and time.  We have "Uncle Abdul" prowling
around Lupin every first weekend.
By the way did your mom ever take you to a strip club?  I hope the
answer is no. I don't agree with exposing a kid to everything in the
world just because it exists.  It exists but that doesn't mean one
will ever in their lives be exposed to it.  Especially in America.  I
guess you could go around exposing your child to cock fights and all
kinds of stuff "because it exists"  but indeed it can screw a kid up
big time.
Post by Jenny6833A
Post by Anna
And you wonder why so many in the general public think that nudists
are a bunch of sexual sickos.
If we'd lived in the San Jose area, my Mom would have taken me to
Lupin too, on regular days and on rent-the-premises days.  She'd have
reasoned that I needed to know about such stuff.  She didn't believe
in sticking her own head in the sand -- or mine either.
She was not a fan of keeping kids ignorant.  Nor am I.
:-)
Jenny
(who suspects that Mr Anna will ignore this post.  Either that or
produce 30 posts, 29 of which are in answer to himself, and none of
which answer my questions.)
How about this?

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfmoms/detail?entry_id=50395

http://tinyurl.com/3gccf6e

Of course most of us would be outraged. (I would be). But it's all
about lines and the exact boundaries between what is appropriate and
not appropriate. You can sometimes move them slightly without people
getting hurt but if you keep moving them pretty soon you lose
perspective of right and wrong.

I am beginning to think there's really no place for children in
nudism. Even though that is what nudists claim they are trying to go
back towards (the innocence of childhood where being naked was simply
about not having clothes on) still there is just to great a chance for
abuse.
Anna
2011-05-31 19:38:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jenny6833A
<snip>
Post by Anna
Lupin Lodge continues to support at least two (that we know of)
BDSM groups using their property for their activity.
Do they "support" BDSM groups, or merely rent to them?
If the former, so what?
If the latter, so what?
When I was a kid,
You know there's reasons to keep nudism "Family Friendly" besides the
kids.

Many people like to be nude without all the sexual connotations - kids
or no kids. They wouldn't enjoy "Ranchy Nudism".

I know I like to simply be outside in my pool or my backyard gardening
nude without any sexual stuff going on. I know for the lewd out there
they think everyone enjoys social lewd nudity but indeed in a lewd
situation I would like to leave my clothes on and just have my sexual
experiences between my husband and I and not part of a larger social
situation.

Look swingers they love sexualized social nudity but not everyone who
likes social nudity want it to be in lewdness. There are those who
aren't into group orgies but still like the feeling of skinny dipping
or relaxing in the sun without clothes on and the lewdness ruins that
for them.

Swingers can and do have their own places. They need to stick to them
and not ruin it for the nudists.
Zee
2011-05-31 20:31:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Anna
Post by Jenny6833A
<snip>
Post by Anna
Lupin Lodge continues to support at least two (that we know of)
BDSM groups using their property for their activity.
Do they "support" BDSM groups, or merely rent to them?
If the former, so what?
If the latter, so what?
When I was a kid,
You know there's reasons to keep nudism "Family Friendly" besides the
kids.
Many people like to be nude without all the sexual connotations - kids
or no kids.  They wouldn't enjoy "Ranchy Nudism".
I know I like to simply be outside in my pool or my backyard gardening
nude without any sexual stuff going on.  I know for the lewd out there
they think everyone enjoys social lewd nudity but indeed in a lewd
situation I would like to leave my clothes on and just have my sexual
experiences between my husband and I and not part of a larger social
situation.
Look swingers they love sexualized social nudity but not everyone who
likes social nudity want it to be in lewdness.  There are those who
aren't into group orgies but still like the feeling of skinny dipping
or relaxing in the sun without clothes on and the lewdness ruins that
for them.
Swingers can and do have their own places. They need to stick to them
and not ruin it for the nudists.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
well Anna....so the Christians live the good life......they do not
attempt to show their children the evil side of life as they will
prepare them when they come of age to explore and reject what they
have taught them through the years.....and believe me i know many of
them and their lives do turn out well and as they marry their kind and
of couse they experience all the normal things accidents and
sicknesses like everyone else...but it is strange why folks come to
rec nude and actually express a Christian type lifestyle but on the
other hand mock or ridicule the Christians just for being
Christian......could be some Christians are just saying they are
Christian because it seems to stick with children to do the right
thing and not sin ....i am just the elephant in the room ....what do i
know.......i agree it serves no purpose to show children the evil side
of humanity.....those things need to be discovered when they cannot be
avoided as adults.......sooo this is the reason that how many more
centuries will we have to advance in to to really learn that laws in
real life are like life in rec nude....nothing will stop the evil
behavior but to deregulate evil behavior would allow for shame and
boycotting to take the place of placing them in prison cells that no
state can afford to do at this time and it still leaves all the
millions out there still doing what those poor saps got caught
doing.....vote for ron paul and stossal and even ol dennis kinsinish
of ohio ...dumb dem.....i am sick of hearing all the guys that are
going to make laws that will control people and none of them
succeed......z
Anna
2011-05-31 18:52:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jenny6833A
<snip>
Post by Anna
Lupin Lodge continues to support at least two (that we know of)
BDSM groups using their property for their activity.
Do they "support" BDSM groups, or merely rent to them?
If the former, so what?
If the latter, so what?
When I was a kid, my mother took me to a large, publicly owned stadium
to see various shows.  One of them had some rather rauchy lead-in
performances followed by some Elvis-like dork doing a REALLY rauchy
act while singing badly.  A few weeks later, I was treated to a quite
similar sequence of lead-in acts culminating with Billy Graham doing
his equally bizarre come-to-Jesus performance.
Mom most definitely was NOT a fan of either headliner, but thought I
ought to be aware of such stuff and preferred that my initial exposure
be with her.  In both cases, she analyzed what we saw as it was
happening via a sotto-voce running commentary.
People laughed at those who were concerned about Elvis and what his
music would do to our society, but looking back you have to say they
were right.
Post by Jenny6833A
A year or so later, she got us Row Two seats at a boxing match in
which some highly ranked guy from Hoboken beat the local hero damn
near to death -- therebye getting us both sprayed with blood and gore
and giving me a very close-up view of the damage done.  THUD.  SQUIRT.
1.  Was the stadium commission that rented to the rauncy Elvis-like
show "supporting" the goings-on?
2.  Was the stadium commission that rented to the bizarre Billy Graham
show "supporting" those goings-on?
3.  Was my Mom "supporting" either of them?  Was she "supporting"
boxing and the "let them fight until one falls down" mentality of the
day?
4.  Or was I, in each case, getting a parentally supervised education?
Post by Anna
And you wonder why so many in the general public think that nudists
are a bunch of sexual sickos.
If we'd lived in the San Jose area, my Mom would have taken me to
Lupin too, on regular days and on rent-the-premises days.  She'd have
reasoned that I needed to know about such stuff.  She didn't believe
in sticking her own head in the sand -- or mine either.
She was not a fan of keeping kids ignorant.  Nor am I.
:-)
Jenny
(who suspects that Mr Anna will ignore this post.  Either that or
produce 30 posts, 29 of which are in answer to himself, and none of
which answer my questions.)
Anna
2011-05-31 19:29:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jenny6833A
<snip>
Post by Anna
Lupin Lodge continues to support at least two (that we know of)
BDSM groups using their property for their activity.
Do they "support" BDSM groups, or merely rent to them?
If the former, so what?
If the latter, so what?
If you don't think that renting to a group is a sign of at least a
level of support let look at it this way...

Would you be okay with Lupin Lodge renting their place out to Skinhead
Nazis for an Aryan Festival? Their key singers Prussian Blue.

If not, why not? After all they are just renting to them. Not
"supporting them" or their white supremacist cause. Just renting.

See, because renting to a group does at least indicate a level of
support. That's why you would oppose it.
James Dale Guckert
2011-05-30 21:37:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Anna
Lupin Lodge continues to support at least two (that we know of)
BDSM groups using their property for their activity.
So much for your ability to foment an anti-sex revolution, eh?
--
JDG
Zee
2011-05-30 21:44:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by James Dale Guckert
Post by Anna
Lupin Lodge continues to support at least two (that we know of)
BDSM groups using their property for their activity.
So much for your ability to foment an anti-sex revolution, eh?
--
JDG
who in rec nude has ever tried to do that...if you were mature you
would know Anna i and others are only trying to remove the kids from
sexual behavior that is associated with nudist places......oh well
hell you dont understand so but Anna can understand for sure.......z
Anna
2011-05-31 18:55:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Zee
Post by James Dale Guckert
Post by Anna
Lupin Lodge continues to support at least two (that we know of)
BDSM groups using their property for their activity.
So much for your ability to foment an anti-sex revolution, eh?
--
JDG
who in rec nude has ever tried to do that...if you were mature you
would know Anna i and others are only trying to remove the kids from
sexual behavior  that is associated with nudist places......oh well
hell you dont understand so but Anna can understand for sure.......z
Absolutely. Nothing wrong with protecting your children as best as
possible. In fact that's your DUTY as a parent.
Yankie Boss
2011-05-31 22:33:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Zee
Post by James Dale Guckert
Post by Anna
Lupin Lodge continues to support at least two (that we know of)
BDSM groups using their property for their activity.
So much for your ability to foment an anti-sex revolution, eh?
--
JDG
who in rec nude has ever tried to do that...if you were mature you
would know Anna i and others are only trying to remove the kids from
sexual behavior  that is associated with nudist places......oh well
hell you dont understand so but Anna can understand for sure.......z
But who is trying to remove the perverts?
And as for Anna understanding [you] … she must be the only one!
Zee
2011-06-01 01:17:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Yankie Boss
Post by Zee
Post by James Dale Guckert
Post by Anna
Lupin Lodge continues to support at least two (that we know of)
BDSM groups using their property for their activity.
So much for your ability to foment an anti-sex revolution, eh?
--
JDG
who in rec nude has ever tried to do that...if you were mature you
would know Anna i and others are only trying to remove the kids from
sexual behavior  that is associated with nudist places......oh well
hell you dont understand so but Anna can understand for sure.......z
But who is trying to remove the perverts?
And as for Anna understanding [you] … she must be the only one!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Anna...we have a late bloomer here.....seems as though he may not be
american and is frustrated....he is right about one thing.....no one
is trying to run out the perverts.....but he is not concerned that
family nudism is slowly but surely going the way of the dinos because
of uncontrollable sexual permissiveness in camps and beaches......laws
do not work ....i have experienced many loop holes that are designed
by lawyers by design to accomodate the ones that are not legal to
continue being an employed person rather than unemployed and
nuisance.....better folks can beat the system to save the system....z
Virtual Shadow
2011-05-30 22:52:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by James Dale Guckert
Post by Anna
Lupin Lodge continues to support at least two (that we know of)
BDSM groups using their property for their activity.
So much for your ability to foment an anti-sex revolution, eh?
--
JDG
WHAT'S A GUCKERT? LOL
Anna
2011-05-31 18:29:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by James Dale Guckert
Post by Anna
Lupin Lodge continues to support at least two (that we know of)
BDSM groups using their property for their activity.
So much for your ability to foment an anti-sex revolution, eh?
--
JDG
Look, if nudism wants to be "pro sex" (in that every sexual perversion
is okay) then that is how they should advertise themselves and stop
with this Norman Rockwell "Ye Ole Dipping Hole" portrayal.

Nudism can't be both.
James Dale Guckert
2011-06-01 08:24:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Anna
Post by James Dale Guckert
Post by Anna
Lupin Lodge continues to support at least two (that we know of)
BDSM groups using their property for their activity.
So much for your ability to foment an anti-sex revolution, eh?
Look, if nudism wants to be "pro sex" (in that every sexual perversion
is okay)
There you go playing with definitions, Dude.
Post by Anna
then that is how they should advertise themselves and stop
with this Norman Rockwell "Ye Ole Dipping Hole" portrayal.
What sort of kinky fantasy of yours involves a "Dipping Hole"?
Post by Anna
Nudism can't be both.
And there you go trying to speak on behalf of something you have nothing
to do with.

Again.
--
JDG
Loading...